Twenty-five years in property litigation, the last twelve also before the Supreme Court. I take appeals from the whole of Punjab, and most of my clients today are owners who live abroad and discovered a problem in the land record too late.
Fees and how he charges
Stated by the advocate
First consultation
PKR 10,000, 45 minutes
Per hearing
PKR 30,000 – 60,000 per hearing, more in the Supreme CourtCourt appearances are usually charged one by one
Fixed and stage fees
Appeals quoted per stage, in writing
Not included
Court fees, stamp duty, certified copies, travel to IslamabadCourt fees, stamp duty and copies are paid to the court, not to the advocate
Stated by the advocate. Ranges, not quotes. Ask for the fee agreement in writing before any work starts; it should name the model, the rate, what is included and what is not.
iWritten by the advocate, not by Wakeel. Not advice about your case.
Client reviews · 4
Written by clients
4.2Good · 4 reviews
Excellent2
Good1
Average1
Poor0
Very poor0
Legal skills4.8
Availability3.8
Quality of work4.5
Keeping to the schedule4.2
Communication4.0
You sign in with Google or Apple first, so every review comes from a real person. Your email is never shown.
N
Nasir H.Client · signed in with Google · 15 Jul 2026
Took back our plot from an occupier
5.0Occupied land
Our plot had been occupied for years while we were abroad. Faisal checked the record, filed the case and appeared at every hearing himself. It took fourteen months. We have possession now and the record is corrected.
Legal skills
5.0
Availability
4.0
Quality of work
5.0
Keeping to the schedule
5.0
Communication
5.0
M
Mehwish J.Client · signed in with Apple · 2 Apr 2026
Thorough check before we bought
4.0Forged or wrong record
We asked him to check a house before paying. He found that the seller did not have a clean chain of title and told us not to buy. That saved us. The report took two weeks, a bit longer than promised.
Legal skills
5.0
Availability
4.0
Quality of work
4.0
Keeping to the schedule
4.0
Communication
4.0
Z
Zubair M.Client · signed in with Google · 8 Dec 2025
Experienced and direct
5.0Occupied land
Twenty years in the courts, and it shows. He told us which hearings mattered and which were routine, so we stopped worrying about every date.
Legal skills
5.0
Availability
5.0
Quality of work
5.0
Keeping to the schedule
5.0
Communication
4.0
K
Kamran B.Client · signed in with Google · 27 Sep 2025
Good result, poor communication
3.0Forged or wrong record
The verification itself was correct and the fee was fair. But I had to chase for updates more than once, and one call was missed without a message. I would still use him for court work.
Legal skills
4.0
Availability
2.0
Quality of work
4.0
Keeping to the schedule
3.0
Communication
3.0
Written by clients who signed in with Google or Apple. Wakeel checks each review against the rules (no case details, no names of other people) and publishes it as written, or not at all. Faisal can reply to a review and report one, but cannot edit or remove it.
What to ask before you agree
What will it cost in total, and what is not included?
How and how often will you update me?
What do you need from me, and by when?
Who else at the firm will touch my case?
Get the answers in writing before you send money or documents.